Adaptation in natural and artificial systems
Adaptation in natural and artificial systems
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning
Artificial Immune Systems: A New Computational Intelligence Paradigm
Artificial Immune Systems: A New Computational Intelligence Paradigm
Adaptive Selection Methods for Genetic Algorithms
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
Artificial Immune Recognition System (AIRS): An Immune-Inspired Supervised Learning Algorithm
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques
Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques
Introduction to Data Mining, (First Edition)
Introduction to Data Mining, (First Edition)
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Second Edition (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems)
A comprehensive benchmark of the artificial immune recognition system (AIRS)
ADMA'05 Proceedings of the First international conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Artificial Immune Recognition System (AIRS) is an immune inspired classifier that competes with famous classifiers. One of the most important components of AIRS is resource competition. The goal of resource competition is the development of the fittest individuals. Resource competition phase removes weakest individuals and selects strongest (seemly good) individuals. This type of selection has high selective pressure with a loss of diversity. It may generate premature memory cells and decrease the accuracy of classifier. In this study, the Real World Tournament Selection (RWTS) method is incorporated in resource competition phase of AIRS to prevent this issue and experiments are conducted to evaluate the accuracy of new algorithm (RWTSAIRS). The combination of cross validation and t test is used as evaluation method. Algorithms tested on benchmark datasets of the UCI machine learning repository show that RWTSAIRS obtained higher accuracy than AIRS in all cases and that the difference between accuracies of two algorithms was significant in majority of cases.