The Benefit of Force Feedback in Surgery: Examination of Blunt Dissection
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
Enhancing Transparency of a Position-Exchange Teleoperator
WHC '07 Proceedings of the Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems
Force-Feedback Surgical Teleoperator: Controller Design and Palpation Experiments
HAPTICS '08 Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems
Force Feedback Benefit Depends on Experience in Multiple Degree of Freedom Robotic Surgery Task
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Friction Compensation for Enhancing Transparency of a Teleoperator With Compliant Transmission
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Haptic device using flexible sheet and air jet for presenting virtual lumps under skin
IROS'09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on Intelligent robots and systems
Effects of force feedback and arm compliance on teleoperation for a hygiene task
EuroHaptics'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations, Part I
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Direct haptic feedback and graphical force feed-back have both been hypothesized to improve the performance of robot-assisted surgery. In this study we evaluate the benefits of haptic and graphical force feedback on surgeon performance and tissue exploration behavior during a teleoperated palpation task of artificial tissues. Seven surgeon subjects (four experienced in robot-assisted surgery) used a 7-degree-of-freedom teleoperated surgical robot to identify a comparatively rigid rigid target object (representing a calcified artery) in phantom heart models using the following feedback conditions: (1) direct haptic and graphical feedback, (2) direct haptic only, (3) graphical feedback only, and (4) no feedback. To avoid the problems of force sensing in a minimally invasive surgical environment, we use a position-exchange controller with dynamics compensation for direct haptic feedback and a force estimator displayed via tool-tip tracking bar graph for graphical force feedback. Although the transparency of the system is limited with this approach, results show that direct haptic force feedback minimizes applied forces to the tissue, while coupled haptic and graphical force feedback minimizes subject task error. For experienced surgeons, haptic force feedback substantially reduced task error independent of graphical feedback.