Reasoning about knowledge
Tractable multiagent planning for epistemic goals
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 3
Design and Synthesis of Synchronization Skeletons Using Branching-Time Temporal Logic
Logic of Programs, Workshop
Alternating-time Temporal Logic
FOCS '97 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Complete Axiomatizations for Reasoning about Knowledge and Time
SIAM Journal on Computing
Knowing how to play: uniform choices in logics of agency
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
A Logic for Reasoning about Rational Agents
Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems
Model-Checking Strategic Ability and Knowledge of the Past of Communicating Coalitions
Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies VI
On the relationship between playing rationally and knowing how to play: a logical account
KI'06 Proceedings of the 29th annual German conference on Artificial intelligence
Information and Computation
Specification and verification of multi-agent systems
ESSLLI'10 Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ESSLLI 2010, and ESSLLI 2011 conference on Lectures on Logic and Computation
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
ATEL is one of the most expressive logics for reasoning about knowledge, time and strategies. Several issues around the interpretation of this logic are still unresolved. This paper contributes to the ongoing discussion by showing that agents do not have to know a specific strategy for doing something in order to have a capability. Furthermore we claim that agents can possess so-called strategic knowledge that is derived from their knowledge of strategies being played. In order to prove these claims we present an alternative interpretation of ATEL over extensive game forms. For the definition of abilities we use strategy domination, and to deal with strategic knowledge we include strategy profiles in the model. We illustrate the interpretation issues mentioned using several small examples. Furthermore we show how perfect recall and perfect memory can be characterized.