Validating interaction patterns in HRI

Authors:
Peter H. Kahn, Jr.;Brian T. Gill;Aimee L. Reichert;Takayuki Kanda;Hiroshi Ishiguro;Jolina H. Ruckert
Affiliations:
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA, USA;University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication Laboratory, Kyoto, Japan;Osaka University, Osaka, and ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication Laboratory, Kyoto, Japan;University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Venue:
Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
Year:
2010

Citing 1
Cited 1

Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction

Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction

Pattern language and HCI: expectations and experiences

CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In recent work, "interaction patterns" have been proposed as a means to characterize essential features of human-robot interaction. A problem arises, however, in knowing whether the interaction patterns generated are valid. The same problem arises when researchers in HRI propose other broad conceptualizations that seek to structure social interaction. In this paper, we address this general problem by distinguishing three ways of establishing the validity of interaction patterns. The first form of validity seeks to establish whether the conclusions about interaction patterns are warranted from the data. The second seeks to establish whether the interaction patterns account for the data. And the third seeks to provide sound reasons for the labels of the patterns themselves. Often these three forms of validity are confused in discussions about conceptual categories in HRI.