Online Stochastic Matching: Beating 1-1/e

  • Authors:
  • Jon Feldman;Aranyak Mehta;Vahab Mirrokni;S. Muthukrishnan

  • Affiliations:
  • Google, Inc.;Google, Inc.;Google, Inc.;Google, Inc.

  • Venue:
  • FOCS '09 Proceedings of the 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We study the online stochastic bipartite matching problem, in a form motivated by display ad allocation on the Internet.In the online, but adversarial case, the celebrated result of Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani gives an approximation ratio of $1-{1\over e} \simeq 0.632$, a very familiar bound that holds for many online problems; further, the bound is tight in this case. In the online, stochastic case when nodes are drawn repeatedly from a known distribution, the greedy algorithm matches this approximation ratio, but still, no algorithm is known that beats the $1 - {1\over e}$ bound.Our main result is a $0.67$-approximation online algorithm for stochastic bipartite matching, breaking this $1 - {1\over e}$ barrier. Furthermore, we show that no online algorithm can produce a $1-\epsilon$ approximation for an arbitrarily small $\epsilon$ for this problem. Our algorithms are based on computing an optimal offline solution to the expected instance, and using this solution as a guideline in the process of online allocation. We employ a novel application of the idea of the power of two choices from load balancing: we compute two disjoint solutions to the expected instance, and use both of them in the online algorithm in a prescribed preference order. To identify these two disjoint solutions, we solve a max flow problem in a boosted flow graph, and then carefully decompose this maximum flow to two edge-disjoint (near-) matchings. In addition to guiding the online decision making, these two offline solutions are used to characterize an upper bound for the optimum in any scenario. This is done by identifying a cut whose value we can bound under the arrival distribution. At the end, we discuss extensions of our results to more general bipartite allocations that are important in a display ad application.