Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization
Evolutionary Computation
Approximating the Nondominated Front Using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy
Evolutionary Computation
Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms
Evolutionary Computation
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case studyand the strength Pareto approach
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Evolutionary Computation
Introduction to Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization
Multiobjective Optimization
On the Effect of the Steady-State Selection Scheme in Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms
EMO '09 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Spread Assessment for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
EMO '09 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Parallel multi-objective evolutionary algorithms on graphics processing units
Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers
Ranking Methods for Many-Objective Optimization
MICAI '09 Proceedings of the 8th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence
EvoOligo: oligonucleotide probe design with multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
EMO'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
Adaptive, convergent, and diversified archiving strategy for multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Alternative fitness assignment methods for many-objective optimization problems
EA'09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial evolution
EMO'11 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
Microarray probe design using ε-multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with thermodynamic criteria
EuroGP'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Applications of Evolutionary Computing
An EMO algorithm using the hypervolume measure as selection criterion
EMO'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Multi-objective maximin sorting scheme
EMO'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Comparing classical generating methods with an evolutionary multi-objective optimization method
EMO'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for multivariable PI controller design
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Asynchronous master/slave moeas and heterogeneous evaluation costs
Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Influence of relaxed dominance criteria in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
Proceedings of the 15th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
General framework for localised multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The trade-off between obtaining a good distribution of Pareto-optimal solutions and obtaining them in a small computational time is an important issue in evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO). It has been well established in the EMO literature that although SPEA produces a better distribution compared to NSGA-II, the computational time needed to run SPEA is much larger. In this paper, we suggest a clustered NSGA-II which uses an identical clustering technique to that used in SPEA for obtaining a better distribution. Moreover, we propose a steady-state MOEA based on ɛ-dominance concept and efficient parent and archive update strategies. Based on a comparative study on a number of two and three objective test problems, it is observed that the steady-state MOEA achieves a comparable distribution to the clustered NSGA-II with a much less computational time.