Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Stochastic method for the solution of unconstrained vector optimization problems
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
Towards a quick computation of well-spread pareto-optimal solutions
EMO'03 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Journal of Global Optimization
Gradient Based Stochastic Mutation Operators in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization
ICANNGA '07 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms, Part I
On gradient based local search methods in unconstrained evolutionary multi-objective optimization
EMO'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
HM'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Hybrid metaheuristics
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
For the past decade, many evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) methodologies have been developed and applied to find multiple Pareto-optimal solutions in a single simulation run. In this paper, we discuss three different classical generating methods, some of which were suggested even before the inception of EMO methodologies. These methods specialize in finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions in a single simulation run. On visual comparisons of the efficient frontiers obtained for a number of two and three-objective test problems, these algorithms are evaluated with an EMO methodology. The results bring out interesting insights about the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. Further investigations of such classical generating methodologies and their evaluation should enable researchers to design a hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm which may be better than each individual method.