Reasoning about infinite computations
Information and Computation
Computer-aided verification of coordinating processes: the automata-theoretic approach
Computer-aided verification of coordinating processes: the automata-theoretic approach
POPL '77 Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages
A Discipline of Programming
Automatic Abstraction Using Generalized Model Checking
CAV '02 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification
A theory of predicate-complete test coverage and generation
FMCO'04 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Formal Methods for Components and Objects
CAV'05 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computer Aided Verification
On the construction of fine automata for safety properties
ATVA'06 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis
Leaping loops in the presence of abstraction
CAV'07 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Computer aided verification
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Abstraction frameworks use under-approximating transitions in order to prove existential properties of concrete systems. Under-approximating transitions refer to the concrete states that correspond to a particular abstract state in a universal manner. For example, there is a must transition from abstract state a to abstract state a′ only if all the concrete states in a have successors in a′. The universal nature of under-approximating transitions makes them closed under transitivity. Consequently, reachability queries about the concrete system, which have applications in falsification and testing, can be answered by reasoning about its abstraction. On the negative side, the universal nature of under-approximating transitions makes them dependent on all the variables of the program. The abstraction, on the other hand, often hides some of the variables. Since the universal quantification in must transitions ranges over all variables, this often prevents the abstraction from associating a must transition with statements that refer to hidden variables. We introduce and study partitioned-must transitions. The idea is to partition the program variables to relevant and irrelevant ones, and restrict the universal quantification inside must transitions to the relevant variables. Usual must transitions are a special case of partitioned-must transitions in which all variables are relevant. Partitioned-must transitions exist in many realistic settings in which usual must transitions do not exist. As we show, they retain the advantages of must transitions: they are closed under transitivity, their calculation can be automated, and the three-valued semantics induced by usual must transitions is refined to a multi-valued semantics that takes into an account the set of relevant variables.