Rule-based modelling of the software development process
ISPW '88 Proceedings of the 4th international software process workshop on Representing and enacting the software process
Decentralised process enactment in a multi-perspective development environment
Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering
Understanding “why” in software process modelling, analysis, and design
ICSE '94 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering
A paradigm for decentralized process modeling and its realization in the Oz environment
ICSE '94 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Aris-Business Process Frameworks
Aris-Business Process Frameworks
Multi-View Modelling of Software Processes
EWSPT '94 Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Software Process Technology
EWSPT '95 Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Software Process Technology
Distributed Modeling and Distributed Enaction of Business Processes
Proceedings of the 5th European Software Engineering Conference
CORE - a method for controlled requirement specification
ICSE '79 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Software engineering
A view-based system for eliciting software process models
A view-based system for eliciting software process models
The Laws of Software Process: A New Model for the Production and Management of Software
The Laws of Software Process: A New Model for the Production and Management of Software
Real Process Improvement Using the CMMI
Real Process Improvement Using the CMMI
Practical Insight into CMMI
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes a method for organizations to perform process modeling in a decentralized and concurrent manner. The approach is based on the idea that modeling organizations' processes can be performed by individuals actually performing the processes. Instead of having a central and devoted group of people to analyze, understand, model and improve processes, real performers are held responsible to model and improve their own processes concurrently. The paper also summarizes the lessons learned by application of the method in two organizations.