Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems
Science of Computer Programming
Cecil: A Sequencing Constraint Language for Automatic Static Analysis Generation
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Interprocedural static analysis of sequencing constraints
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
Propositional belief base update and minimal change
Artificial Intelligence
Model checking
Knowlege in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems
Knowlege in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems
Proceedings of the 8th European software engineering conference held jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering
Communication and Concurrency
Computer
Behavior Protocols for Software Components
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Model-Based Testing of Reactive Systems: Advanced Lectures (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)
Model-Based Testing of Reactive Systems: Advanced Lectures (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)
Spin model checker, the: primer and reference manual
Spin model checker, the: primer and reference manual
Towards a theory of interface-based design of hierarchical reactive systems
Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation - DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium
Computer Languages, Systems and Structures
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In industrial automation, control software often has to get changed and adapted by domain experts and end users who have no or only limited software development expertise. This results in high demands on programming environments with respect to supporting, guiding, and supervising the programming tasks. In this paper we present an approach based on model checking and artificial intelligence techniques to guide domain experts in building control software which is guaranteed to obey specified contracts and constraints. The work is based on Monaco which is a domain-specific language for programming automation solutions. As Monaco employs a hierarchical component approach, the verification is done hierarchically where an upper component is verified against the contracts of its subcomponents. The verification approach is leveraged in different programming support systems which give immediate feedback about valid and invalid programs in an integrated development environment.