Is it the right answer?: exploiting web redundancy for Answer Validation
ACL '02 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
In question answering, two heads are better than one
NAACL '03 Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1
Graph-based answer fusion in multilingual question answering
TSD'07 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Text, speech and dialogue
The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge
MLCW'05 Proceedings of the First international conference on Machine Learning Challenges: evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Visual Object Classification, and Recognizing Textual Entailment
Overview of the CLEF 2005 multilingual question answering track
CLEF'05 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Cross-Language Evalution Forum: accessing Multilingual Information Repositories
SPARTE, a test suite for recognising textual entailment in spanish
CICLing'06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing
Overview of the CLEF 2006 multilingual question answering track
CLEF'06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Cross-Language Evaluation Forum: evaluation of multilingual and multi-modal information retrieval
Versatile question answering systems: seeing in synthesis
International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems
Learning to select the correct answer in multi-stream question answering
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Nowadays there exist several kinds of question answering systems. According to recent evaluation results, most of these systems are complementary (i.e., each one is better than the others in answering some specific type of questions). This fact indicates that a pertinent combination of various systems may allow improving the best individual result. This paper focuses on this problem. It proposes using an answer validation method to handle this combination. The main advantage of this approach is that it does not rely on internal system's features nor depend on external answer's redundancies. Experimental results confirm the appropriateness of our proposal. They mainly show that it outperforms individual system's results as well as the precision obtained by a redundancy-based combination strategy.