On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic
SIGCOMM '93 Conference proceedings on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
End-to-end fault tolerance using transport layer multihoming
End-to-end fault tolerance using transport layer multihoming
Concurrent multipath transfer using SCTP multihoming over independent end-to-end paths
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Performance implications of a bounded receive buffer in concurrent multipath transfer
Computer Communications
Concurrent multipath transfer using transport layer multihoming: performance under network failures
MILCOM'06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE conference on Military communications
Packet-level traffic measurements from the Sprint IP backbone
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
An Adaptive Optimized RTO Algorithm for Multi-homed Wireless Environments
WWIC 2009 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Wired/Wireless Internet Communications
Performance evaluation of distributing real-time video over concurrent multipath
WCNC'09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE conference on Wireless Communications & Networking Conference
Employing transport layer multi-railing in cluster networks
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
WD'09 Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP conference on Wireless days
EAU: efficient address updating for seamless handover in multi-homed mobile environments
NETWORKING'10 Proceedings of the 9th IFIP TC 6 international conference on Networking
International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Previously, we identified the failure-induced receive buffer (rbuf) blocking problem in Concurrent Multipath Transfer using SCTP multihoming (CMT), and proposed CMT with a Potentially-failed destination state (CMTPF) to alleviate rbuf blocking. In this paper, we complete our evaluation of CMT vs. CMT-PF. Using ns-2 simulations we show that CMT-PF performs on par or better than CMT during more aggressive failure detection thresholds than recommended by RFC4960. We also examine whether the modified sender behavior in CMT-PF degrades performance during non-failure scenarios. Our evaluations consider: (i) realistic loss model with symmetric and asymmetric path loss, (ii) varying path RTTs. We find that CMT-PF performs as well as CMT during non-failure scenarios, and interestingly, outperforms CMT when the paths experience asymmetric rbuf blocking conditions. We recommend that CMT be replaced by CMT-PF in future CMT implementations and RFCs.