Principles of artificial intelligence
Principles of artificial intelligence
Conceptual organization of case law knowledge bases
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Designing text retrieval systems for conceptual searching
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Ashley,K. D.-But, see, accord: generating blue book citations in HYPO
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Conceptual retrieval and case law
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A connectionist and symbolic hybrid for improving legal research
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 2
An abductive theory of legal issues
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 2
Building explanations from rules and structured cases
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
CABARET: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
The Hearsay-II Speech-Understanding System: Integrating Knowledge to Resolve Uncertainty
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Understanding Editorial Text: A Computer Model of Argument Comprehension
Understanding Editorial Text: A Computer Model of Argument Comprehension
Handbook of AI
Construction of preferred causal hypotheses for reasoning with uncertain knowledge
Construction of preferred causal hypotheses for reasoning with uncertain knowledge
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A hybrid CBR-IR approach to legal information retrieval
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
PLAID: proactive legal assistance
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Detecting change in legal concepts
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Context sensitive case comparisons in practical ethics: reasoning about reasons
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Understanding Similarity: A Joint Project for Psychology,Case-Based Reasoning, and Law
Artificial Intelligence Review
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities: Towards the Creation of More Persuasive Agents
Artificial Intelligence Review
Legal information retrieval and application to e-rulemaking
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Case retrieval through multiple indexing and heuristic search
IJCAI'93 Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 2
A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation
Artificial Intelligence Review
The Knowledge Engineering Review
PADUA: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Case-based strategies for argumentation dialogues in agent societies
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we describe a system, called BankXX, which generates arguments by performing a heuristic best-first search of a highly interconnected network of legal knowledge. The legal knowledge includes cases represented from a variety of points of view—cases as collections of facts, cases as dimensionally-analyzed fact situations, cases as bundles of citations, and cases as prototypical factual scripts—as well as legal theories represented in terms of domain factors. BankXX performs its search for useful information using one of three evaluation functions encoded at different levels of abstraction: the domain level, an “argument-piece” level, and the overall argument level. Evaluation at the domain level uses easily accessible information about the nodes, such as their type; evaluation at the argument-piece level uses information about generally useful components of case-based argument, such as best cases and supporting legal theories; evaluation at the overall-argument level uses factors, called argument dimensions, which address the overall substance and quality of an argument, such as the centrality of its supporting cases or the success record of its best theory. BankXX is instantiated in the area of personal bankruptcy governed by Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which permits a debtor to be discharged from debts through completion of a court-approved payment plan. In particular, our system addresses the requirement that such Chapter 13 plans be “proposed in good faith.”