Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
Computational Linguistics
Deep models, normative reasoning and legal expert systems
ICAIL '89 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Proceedings of the first international conference on Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
BankXX: a program to generate argument through case-base research
ICAIL '93 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Artificial Intelligence
Abstract argumentation systems
Artificial Intelligence
Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Incorporating critique and argumentation in DSS
Decision Support Systems
Safe and sound: artificial intelligence in hazardous applications
Safe and sound: artificial intelligence in hazardous applications
Extending abstract argumentation systems theory
Artificial Intelligence
Towards a visualization of arguing agents
Future Generation Computer Systems - Special issue on educational applications of VRML
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
Artificial Intelligence
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1
Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities: Towards the Creation of More Persuasive Agents
Artificial Intelligence Review
A Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation
ATAL '97 Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents IV, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages
On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues
AAMAS '03 Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation
ICMAS '00 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000)
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
Law, learning and representation
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
A Logical Model for Commitment and Argument Network for Agent Communication
AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Argumentation-based negotiation
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Predicting outcomes of case based legal arguments
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Towards an argument interchange format
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Artificial Intelligence
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Artificial Intelligence
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web
Artificial Intelligence
Guest Editors' Introduction: Argumentation Technology
IEEE Intelligent Systems
An Argumentation Framework for Communities of Web Services
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Model checking communicative agent-based systems
Knowledge-Based Systems
Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence Theory
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
IJCAI'89 Proceedings of the 11th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
A representationalist theory of intention
IJCAI'93 Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 1
A new logical semantics for agent communication
CLIMA VII'06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems
An agent communication protocol for resolving conflicts
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
A computational model for conversation policies for agent communication
CLIMA'04 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems
An agent communication protocol for resolving conflicts
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Using argumentation to model and deploy agent-based B2B applications
Knowledge-Based Systems
Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Integrating decision support and social networks
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Supporting argumentation systems by graph representation and computation
GKR'11 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Measuring and analyzing agents' uncertainty in argumentation-based negotiation dialogue games
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Hi-index | 0.01 |
Understanding argumentation and its role in human reasoning has been a continuous subject of investigation for scholars from the ancient Greek philosophers to current researchers in philosophy, logic and artificial intelligence. In recent years, argumentation models have been used in different areas such as knowledge representation, explanation, proof elaboration, commonsense reasoning, logic programming, legal reasoning, decision making, and negotiation. However, these models address quite specific needs and there is need for a conceptual framework that would organize and compare existing argumentation-based models and methods. Such a framework would be very useful especially for researchers and practitioners who want to select appropriate argumentation models or techniques to be incorporated in new software systems with argumentation capabilities. In this paper, we propose such a conceptual framework, based on taxonomy of the most important argumentation models, approaches and systems found in the literature. This framework highlights the similarities and differences between these argumentation models. As an illustration of the practical use of this framework, we present a case study which shows how we used this framework to select and enrich an argumentation model in a knowledge acquisition project which aimed at representing argumentative knowledge contained in texts critiquing military courses of action.