C4.5: programs for machine learning
C4.5: programs for machine learning
The split-up system: integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Finding legally relevant passages in case opinions
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Precedent, deontic logic, and inheritance
ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Theory based explanation of case law domains: 38
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Machine Learning
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
AGATHA: automated construction of case law theories through heuristic search
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Generating legal arguments and predictions from case texts
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Is linguistic information relevant for the classification of legal texts?
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
AGATHA: using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argument based machine learning
Artificial Intelligence
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
An ontology in OWL for legal case-based reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argument Based Moderation of Benefit Assessment
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes
Artificial Intelligence and Law
A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation
Artificial Intelligence Review
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines in common law of contract
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Application of an ontology-based model to a selected fraudulent disbursement economic crime
AICOL-I/IVR-XXIV'09 Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems: complex systems, the semantic web, ontologies, argumentation, and dialogue
Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Modeling authority commitments in two search and seizure cases
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Semantic Processing of Legal Texts
Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Ontological modeling of a class of linked economic crimes
Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence IX
Online dispute resolution: an artificial intelligence perspective
Artificial Intelligence Review
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we introduce IBP, an algorithm that combines reasoning with an abstract domain model and case-based reasoning techniques to predict the outcome of case-based legal arguments. Unlike the predictions generated by statistical or machine-learning techniques, IBP's predictions are accompanied by explanations.We describe an empirical evaluation of IBP, in which we compare our algorithm to prediction based on Hypo's and CATO's relevance criteria, and to a number of widely used machine learning algorithms. IBP reaches higher accuracy than all competitors, and hypothesis testing shows that the observed differences are statistically significant. An ablation study indicates that both sources of knowledge in IBP contribute to the accuracy of its predictions.