A comparative study of STOPA and RTPA

  • Authors:
  • Natalia Lopez;Manuel Núñez;Fernando L. Pelayo

  • Affiliations:
  • Dept. Sistemas Informáticos y Programación, Facultad de Informática, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain;Dept. Sistemas Informáticos y Programación, Facultad de Informática, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain;Dept. de Sistemas Informáticos, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain

  • Venue:
  • Transactions on computational science II
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

During the last years it has been widely recognized that formal semanticframeworks improve the capability to represent cognitive processes. In thisline, process algebras have been introduced as formal frameworks to representthis kind of processes. In this paper we compare two process algebras orientedtowards the specification of cognitive processes: RTPA (Real Time Process Algebra)and STOPA (Stochastic Process Algebra). These two formal languages sharea common characteristic: Both of them include a notion of time. Thus, whencomparing the two languages we will concentrate on the different treatment oftime. In order to illustrate how these two languages work we specify a cognitivemodel of the memorizing process both in RTPA and in STOPA. In order to representthe memory, we follow the classical memory classification (sensory buffer,short-term, and long-term memories) where we also consider the so-called actionbuffer memory.