Communicating sequential processes
Communicating sequential processes
A timed model for communicating sequential processes
Theoretical Computer Science - Thirteenth International Colloquim on Automata, Languages and Programming, Renne
Process algebra
MFPS '92 Selected papers of the meeting on Mathematical foundations of programming semantics
Reactive, generative, and stratified models of probabilistic processes
Information and Computation
A compositional approach to performance modelling
A compositional approach to performance modelling
Theoretical Computer Science
Testing preorders for probabilistic processes
Information and Computation
Communication and Concurrency
Handbook of Process Algebra
Process Algebra with Timing
The theory of interactive generalized semi-Markov processes
Theoretical Computer Science
The Real-Time Process Algebra (RTPA)
Annals of Software Engineering
A Formal Framework for E-Barter Based on Microeconomic Theory and Process Algebras
IICS '02 Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Innovative Internet Computing Systems
On the Informatics Laws of Software
ICCI '02 Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
ICCI '02 Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
PAMR: A Process Algebra for the Management of Resources in Concurrent Systems
FORTE '01 Proceedings of the IFIP TC6/WG6.1 - 21st International Conference on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems
CCS + Time = An Interleaving Model for Real Time Systems
ICALP '91 Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
Towards Performance Evaluation with General Distributions in Process Algebras
CONCUR '98 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Concurrency Theory
Acceptance Trees for Probabilistic Processes
CONCUR '95 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Concurrency Theory
Performance Evaluation of Computer and Communication Systems, Joint Tutorial Papers of Performance '93 and Sigmetrics '93
An algebraic approach to the specification of stochastic systems
PROCOMET '98 Proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG2.2,2.3 International Conference on Programming Concepts and Methods
An Overview and Synthesis on Timed Process Algebras
CAV '91 Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Verification
ICCI '02 Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
An example of performance evaluation by using the stochastic process algebra: ROSA
RTCSA '00 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Real-Time Systems and Applications
Formal Aspects of Computing
STOPA: A STOchastic Process Algebra for the Formal Representation of Cognitive Systems
ICCI '04 Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
Formal Description of the Cognitive Process of Decision Making
ICCI '04 Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
Formal specification of multi-agent e-barter systems
Science of Computer Programming
Specifying the memorization process with STOPA
ICCI '05 Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
Formal Description of the Mechanisms and Cognitive Process of Memorization
COGINF '07 Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
Software Engineering Foundations: A Software Science Perspective
Software Engineering Foundations: A Software Science Perspective
Editorial Recent Advances in Cognitive Informatics
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews
Hi-index | 0.00 |
During the last years it has been widely recognized that formal semanticframeworks improve the capability to represent cognitive processes. In thisline, process algebras have been introduced as formal frameworks to representthis kind of processes. In this paper we compare two process algebras orientedtowards the specification of cognitive processes: RTPA (Real Time Process Algebra)and STOPA (Stochastic Process Algebra). These two formal languages sharea common characteristic: Both of them include a notion of time. Thus, whencomparing the two languages we will concentrate on the different treatment oftime. In order to illustrate how these two languages work we specify a cognitivemodel of the memorizing process both in RTPA and in STOPA. In order to representthe memory, we follow the classical memory classification (sensory buffer,short-term, and long-term memories) where we also consider the so-called actionbuffer memory.