The Strength of Weak Learnability
Machine Learning
Optimal combinations of pattern classifiers
Pattern Recognition Letters
Machine Learning
Combination of Multiple Classifiers Using Local Accuracy Estimates
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
The Case against Accuracy Estimation for Comparing Induction Algorithms
ICML '98 Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning
Using data mining to profile TV viewers
Communications of the ACM - Mobile computing opportunities and challenges
A Comparison of Classification Methods for Predicting Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication
Journal of Management Information Systems
Evaluating and Tuning Predictive Data Mining Models Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves
Journal of Management Information Systems
An Empirical Analysis of Data Requirements for Financial Forecasting with Neural Networks
Journal of Management Information Systems
Support vector machines based on K-means clustering for real-time business intelligence systems
International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining
Vote prediction by iterative domain knowledge and attribute elimination
International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining
International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining
Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: an analysis of its behavior and performance
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans
Using multi decision tree technique to improving decision tree classifier
International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This study empirically explores the use of a group, or ensemble, of classifiers to support managerial decision making in domains characterised by asymmetric misclassification costs. The approach developed in this study is intended to assist a decision maker in determining whether a current situation warrants the choice of an ensemble over an individual classifier. The decision is based primarily on misclassification costs in the decision context and the associated basis on which performance is assessed. We show that the criteria for evaluating classifier performance are fundamentally dependent on the symmetry or asymmetry of misclassification costs. The result of this study is a set of heuristics for identifying highly- and poorly-performing ensembles.