A cost-benefit framework for making architectural decisions in a business context

  • Authors:
  • Jeromy Carriere;Rick Kazman;Ipek Ozkaya

  • Affiliations:
  • Yahoo! Inc., Sunnyvale, CA;U. of Hawaii, Pittsburgh, PA;SEI/CMU, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In any IT-intensive organization, it is useful to have a model to associate a value with software and system architecture decisions. More generally, any effort---a project undertaken by a team---needs to have an associated value to offset its labor and capital costs. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to precisely evaluate the benefit of "architecture projects"---those that aim to improve one or more quality attributes of a system via a structural transformation without (generally) changing its behavior. We often resort to anecdotal and informal "hand-waving" arguments of risk reduction or increased developer productivity. These arguments are typically unsatisfying to the management of organizations accustomed to decision-making based on concrete metrics. This paper will discuss research done to address this long-standing dilemma. Specifically, we will present a model derived from analyzing actual projects undertaken at Vistaprint Corporation. The model presented is derived from an analysis of effort tracked against modifications to specific software components before and after a significant architectural transformation to the subsystem housing those components. In this paper, we will discuss the development, implementation, and iteration of the model and the results that we have obtained.