Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Elements of Argumentation
Mechanism design for abstract argumentation
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
Dialogue games that agents play within a society
Artificial Intelligence
Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game-Theoretical Investigation
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
An axiomatic account of formal argumentation
AAAI'05 Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
A characterisation of strategy-proofness for grounded argumentation semantics
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
On strategic argument selection in structured argumentation systems
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Building an epistemic logic for argumentation
JELIA'12 Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Opponent models with uncertainty for strategic argumentation
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper aims at giving a classification of argumentation games agents play within a multi-agent setting. We investigate different scenarios of such argumentation games that differ in the protocol used for argumentation, i.e. direct, synchronous, and dialectical argumentation protocols, the awareness that agents have on other agents beliefs, and different settings for the preferences of agents. To this end we employ structured argumentation frameworks, which are an extension to Dung's abstract argumentation frameworks that give a simple inner structure to arguments. We also provide some game theoretical results that characterize a specific argumentation game as strategy-proof and develop some argumentation selection strategies that turn out to be the dominant strategies for other specific argumentation games.