On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
Artificial Intelligence
On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
Artificial Intelligence
A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
JELIA '08 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Pareto optimality in abstract argumentation
AAAI'08 Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Nonmanipulable selections from a tournament
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
A characterisation of strategy-proofness for grounded argumentation semantics
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Classification and strategical issues of argumentation games on structured argumentation frameworks
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Pitfalls in Practical Open Multi Agent Argumentation Systems: Malicious Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Argumentation Mechanism Design for Preferred Semantics
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Review: logical mechanism design
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Choosing persuasive arguments for action
The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Strategic argumentation in rigorous persuasion dialogue
ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Assumption-based argumentation for the minimal concession strategy
ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
On strategic argument selection in structured argumentation systems
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Opponent models with uncertainty for strategic argumentation
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Since their introduction by Dung over a decade ago, abstract argumentation frameworks have received increasing interest in artificial intelligence as a convenient model for reasoning about general characteristics of argument. Such a framework consists of a set of arguments and a binary defeat relation among them. Various semantic and computational approaches have been developed to characterise the acceptability of individual arguments in a given argumentation framework. However, little work exists on understanding the strategic aspects of abstract argumentation among self-interested agents. In this paper, we introduce (game-theoretic) argumentation mechanism design (ArgMD), which enables the design and analysis of argumentation mechanisms for self-interested agents. We define the notion of a direct-revelation argumentation mechanism, in which agents must decide which arguments to reveal simultaneously. We then design a particular direct argumentation mechanism and prove that it is strategy proof under specific conditions; that is, the strategy profile in which each agent reveals its arguments truthfully is a dominant strategy equilibrium.