Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II with Cdrom
Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II with Cdrom
HICSS '05 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Volume 09
MSR '05 Proceedings of the 2005 international workshop on Mining software repositories
Software Estimation: Demystifying the Black Art
Software Estimation: Demystifying the Black Art
A Replicated Quantitative Analysis of Fault Distributions in Complex Software Systems
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Using Developer Information as a Factor for Fault Prediction
PROMISE '07 Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Predictor Models in Software Engineering
The influence of organizational structure on software quality: an empirical case study
Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Empirical Software Engineering
Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN conference companion on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Individual differences of developers in performance and introduced defects have been reported by many research studies and are frequently observed in software development practice. Thus, when the source of defects in the final product is discussed, developers are usually the first under suspicion. However, defects residing in a released software product are the result of defects introduced throughout the sequence of development activities (e.g., specification, design, implementation, testing and stabilization) less the defects detected and removed in these activities. This case study explores and describes the difference between developers in terms of associated post-release (i.e., delivered) defects. The results are put in relation to the intensity with which a developer's changes and enhancements have been tested to identify a latent influence by pre-release quality assurance measures.