Exploring Individual Characteristics and Programming Performance: Implications for Programmer Selection

Authors:
David P. Darcy;Meng (Jessie) Ma
Affiliations:
University of Maryland, College Park;University of Maryland, College Park
Venue:
HICSS '05 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Volume 09
Year:
2005

Citing 0
Cited 6

Motivation in Software Engineering: A systematic literature review

Information and Software Technology
Models of motivation in software engineering

Information and Software Technology
A systematic review of theory use in studies investigating the motivations of software engineers

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
An initial investigation of software practitioners' motivation

CHASE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects on Software Engineering
Stakeholder dissonance: disagreements on project outcome and its impact on team motivation across three countries

Proceedings of the 2010 Special Interest Group on Management Information System's 48th annual conference on Computer personnel research on Computer personnel research
The usual suspects: a case study on delivered defects per developer

Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Programmer selection has become a critical strategic software engineering issue as organizations become increasingly dependent on IT. Programmer labor shortage, rising expectations for IT, and the large negative impact of a poor choice make selection even more complicated. This study examines the relationship between individual differences (such as personality, domain specific factors, demographics, ability, and programming experience) and programmer performance. We also broaden the concept of programmer performance beyond specification conformance to software complexity. In an experiment, 29 participants attempted to program a problem. Though there was no time limit, only five programmed the solution as specified. Across the two groups, those who satisfied the specification and those who did not, only ability and age differed. There was no difference in personality or domain specific factors. Though the group who completed the specification is too small to test inferences, one point is clear: even among the small group, there was major variation in the complexity of the software produced. The relationship between individual differences and software complexity warrants further study.