Consistability: describing usually consistent systems

  • Authors:
  • Amitanand S. Aiyer;Eric Anderson;Xiaozhou Li;Mehul A. Shah;Jay J. Wylie

  • Affiliations:
  • Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA;Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA;Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA;Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA;Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA

  • Venue:
  • HotDep'08 Proceedings of the Fourth conference on Hot topics in system dependability
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Current weak consistency semantics provide worst-case guarantees to clients. These guarantees fail to adequately describe systems that provide varying levels of consistency in the face of distinct failure modes, or that achieve better than worst-case guarantees during normal execution. The inability to make precise statements about consistency throughout a system's execution represents a lost opportunity to clearly understand client application requirements and to optimize systems and services appropriately. In this position paper, we motivate the need for and introduce the concept of consistability--a unified metric of consistency and availability. Consistability offers a means of describing, specifying, and discussing how much consistency a usually consistent system provides, and how often it does so. We describe our initial results of applying consistability reasoning to a keyvalue store we are developing and to other recent distributed systems. We also discuss the limitations of our consistability definition.