Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Comparing Arguments Using Preference Orderings for Argument-Based Reasoning
ICTAI '96 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
System Z: a natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to nonmonotonic reasoning
TARK '90 Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
Resolution-Based Argumentation Semantics
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Extending CP-nets with stronger conditional preference statements
AAAI'04 Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence
Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
ADT '09 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory
Preferences in AI: An overview
Artificial Intelligence
Arguing with valued preference relations
ECSQARU'11 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty
Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
ECSQARU'11 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty
A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Revisiting preferences and argumentation
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two
A general account of argumentation with preferences
Artificial Intelligence
Representing synergy among arguments with choquet integral
ECSQARU'13 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Argumentation is a reasoning model based on constructing arguments, determining potential conflicts between arguments and determining acceptable arguments. Dung's argumentation theory is an abstract framework based on a binary defeat relation between arguments. Due to this abstract representation, it has been instantiated in different ways. In particular, preference-based argumentation frameworks take into account a preference relation over arguments together with a (non necessarily symmetric) attack relation. We show that preference-based argumentation frameworks faithfully instantiate Dung's framework only when the attack relation is symmetric. Moreover the latter condition prevents undesirable results. We also promote a higher impact of preferences in preference-based argumentation frameworks and propose different ways to rank-order sets of acceptable arguments.