A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Agent Dialogues with Conflicting Preferences
ATAL '01 Revised Papers from the 8th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VIII
Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
ECSQARU '07 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Algorithms for Weighted Boolean Optimization
SAT '09 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing
On solving Boolean multilevel optimization problems
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Solving satisfiability problems with preferences
Constraints
Refined Preference-based Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Preference-Based Argumentation Framework with Varied-Preference Intensity
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
A Framework for Certified Boolean Branch-and-Bound Optimization
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Algorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Arguing with valued preference relations
ECSQARU'11 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty
On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation
UAI'98 Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Representing synergy among arguments with choquet integral
ECSQARU'13 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Argument-based reasoning is a promising approach to handle inconsistent belief bases. The basic idea is to justify each plausible conclusion by acceptable arguments. The purpose of this paper is to enforce the concept of acceptability by the integration of preference orderings. Pursuing previous work on preference-based argumentation, we focus here on the definition of preference relations for comparing conflicting arguments. We present a comparative study of several proposals. Then, we propose techniques for computing and comparing arguments, taking advantage of an Assumption-Based Truth Maintenance System.