Report on CLEF-2001 Experiments: Effective Combined Query-Translation Approach
CLEF '01 Revised Papers from the Second Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum on Evaluation of Cross-Language Information Retrieval Systems
Overview of the ImageCLEFmed 2007 Medical Retrieval and Medical Annotation Tasks
Advances in Multilingual and Multimodal Information Retrieval
The CLEF 2005 cross–language image retrieval track
CLEF'05 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Cross-Language Evalution Forum: accessing Multilingual Information Repositories
The CLEF 2004 cross-language image retrieval track
CLEF'04 Proceedings of the 5th conference on Cross-Language Evaluation Forum: multilingual Information Access for Text, Speech and Images
An integrated approach for medical image retrieval through combining textual and visual features
CLEF'09 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Cross-language evaluation forum: multimedia experiments
The MedGIFT group at ImageCLEF 2009
CLEF'09 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Cross-language evaluation forum: multimedia experiments
An extended vector space model for content-based image retrieval
CLEF'09 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Cross-language evaluation forum: multimedia experiments
Enhancing content-based image retrieval using machine learning techniques
AMT'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Active media technology
ICPR'10 Proceedings of the 20th International conference on Recognizing patterns in signals, speech, images, and videos
ISDM at imageCLEF 2010 fusion task
ICPR'10 Proceedings of the 20th International conference on Recognizing patterns in signals, speech, images, and videos
Information fusion for combining visual and textual image retrieval in imageCLEF@ICPR
ICPR'10 Proceedings of the 20th International conference on Recognizing patterns in signals, speech, images, and videos
Biomedical imaging modality classification using combined visual features and textual terms
Journal of Biomedical Imaging - Special issue on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
MCBR-CDS'09 Proceedings of the First MICCAI international conference on Medical Content-Based Retrieval for Clinical Decision Support
Using MeSH to expand queries in medical image retrieval
MCBR-CDS'11 Proceedings of the Second MICCAI international conference on Medical Content-Based Retrieval for Clinical Decision Support
Correlating medical-dependent query features with image retrieval models using association rules
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management
Semantic concept-enriched dependence model for medical information retrieval
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
2009 was the sixth year for the ImageCLEF medical retrieval task. Participation was strong again with 38 registered research groups. 17 groups submitted runs and thus participated actively in the tasks. The database in 2009 was similar to the one used in 2008, containing scientific articles from two radiology journals, Radiology and Radiographics. The size of the database was increased to a total of 74,902 images. For the first time, 5 case-based topics were provided as an exploratory task. These topics' unit of retrieval was intended to be the source article and not the image itself. Case-based topics are designed to be closer to the clinical workflow, as clinicians often seek information about patient cases using incomplete information consisting of symptoms, findings, and a set of images. Supplying cases to a clinician from the scientific literature that are similar to the case (s)he is treating models what may become an important application of image retrieval in the future. We also introduced a lung nodule detection task in 2009. This task used the CT slices from the Lung Imaging Data Consortium (LIDC) includeding ground truth in the from of manual annotations. The goal of this task was to create algorithms to automatically detect lung nodules. Although there seemed to be significant interest in the task only two groups submitted results with a proprietary software from an industry participant achieving very good results.