Rituals in e-government implementation: an analysis of failure

Authors:
Rahul De';Sandeep Sarkar
Affiliations:
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore;Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Venue:
EGOV'10 Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic government
Year:
2010

Citing 7
Cited 1

Restoring a sense of control during implementation: how user involvement leads to system acceptance

MIS Quarterly
User participation and democracy: a discussion of Scandinavian research on systems development

Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems
Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation

MIS Quarterly
Power, politics, and MIS implementation

Communications of the ACM
Implementing public information systems in developing countries: learning from a success story

Information Technology for Development
Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development

MIS Quarterly
Fighting against windmills: strategic information systems and organizational deep structures

MIS Quarterly

KPI-spported PDCA model for innovation policy management in local government

EGOV'11 Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic government

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents a case analysis of a failed e-government implementation in a developing country context. The project involved constructing a large system for a central government department in India. After seven years and a few million rupees in costs, the project was terminated. Prior research in failed information systems implementations has highlighted many issues, most of which are now part of software project management literature. With e-government systems, though scientific project management is diligently applied, failure rates are very high, particularly in developing countries. The analysis in this paper suggests that though issues of lack of user involvement, inadequate delegation, and improper planning are responsible, the important causes are the rituals that management enacted, that had overt rationality but buried agendas.