International Journal of Human-Computer Studies - Special issue: Interactive graphical communication
Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge
Computers in Human Behavior
Dynamic visualisations and hypermedia: Beyond the "Wow" factor
Computers in Human Behavior
The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations
Computers in Human Behavior
Adapting prior knowledge activation: Mobilisation, perspective taking, and learners' prior knowledge
Computers in Human Behavior
The role of spatial descriptions in learning from multimedia
Computers in Human Behavior
Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study
Computers in Human Behavior
The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations
Computers in Human Behavior
Contemporary cognitive load theory research: The good, the bad and the ugly
Computers in Human Behavior
Review: A systematic characterisation of expository animations
Computers in Human Behavior
Annotations in captioned animation: Effects on vocabulary learning and listening skills
Computers & Education
Should hand actions be observed when learning hand motor skills from instructional animations?
Computers in Human Behavior
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Many animations impose a high cognitive load due to the transience of information, which often hampers learning. Segmentation, that is presenting animations in pieces (i.e., segments), has been proposed as a means to reduce this high cognitive load. The expertise reversal effect shows, however, that design measures that have a positive effect on cognitive load and learning for students with lower levels of prior knowledge, might not be effective, or might even have a negative effect on cognitive load and learning for students with higher levels of prior knowledge. This experiment with animated worked-out examples showed an expertise reversal effect of segmentation: segmented animations were more efficient than continuous animations (i.e., equal test performance with lower investment of mental effort during learning) for students with lower levels of prior knowledge, but not for students with higher levels of prior knowledge.