Structure identification of fuzzy model
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Fuzzy modeling with hybrid systems
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems
Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems
A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II
PPSN VI Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
An evolutionary algorithm for constrained multi-objective optimization
CEC '02 Proceedings of the Evolutionary Computation on 2002. CEC '02. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress - Volume 02
International Journal of Intelligent Systems
Rule-based modeling: precision and transparency
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Semantic constraints for membership function optimization
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans
Application of statistical information criteria for optimal fuzzy model construction
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
FuGeNeSys-a fuzzy genetic neural system for fuzzy modeling
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, a multi-objective constrained optimization model is proposed to improve interpretability of TSK fuzzy models. This approach allows a linguistic approximation of the fuzzy models. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is implemented with three different selection and generational replacements schemata (Niched Preselection, NSGA-II and ENORA) to generate fuzzy models in the proposed optimization context. The results clearly show a real ability and effectiveness of the proposed approach to find accurate and interpretable TSK fuzzy models. These schemata have been compared in terms of accuracy, interpretability and compactness by using three test problems studied in literature. Statistical tests have also been used with optimality and diversity multi-objective metrics to compare the schemata.