Predicate migration: optimizing queries with expensive predicates

  • Authors:

  • Joseph M. Hellerstein;Michael Stonebraker

  • Affiliations:

  • Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI and Computer Science Division, EECS Department, University of California Berkeley, CA;Computer Science Division, EECS Department, University of California Berkeley, CA

  • Venue:
  • SIGMOD '93 Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
  • Year:
  • 1993

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The traditional focus of relational query optimization schemes has been on the choice of join methods and join orders. Restrictions have typically been handled in query optimizers by “predicate pushdown” rules, which apply restrictions in some random order before as many joins as possible. These rules work under the assumption that restriction is essentially a zero-time operation. However, today's extensible and object-oriented database systems allow users to define time-consuming functions, which may be used in a query's restriction and join predicates. Furthermore, SQL has long supported subquery predicates, which may be arbitrarily time-consuming to check. Thus restrictions should not be considered zero-time operations, and the model of query optimization must be enhanced.In this paper we develop a theory for moving expensive predicates in a query plan so that the total cost of the plan — including the costs of both joins and restrictions — is minimal. We present an algorithm to implement the theory, as well as results of our implementation in POSTGRES. Our experience with the newly enhanced POSTGRES query optimizer demonstrates that correctly optimizing queries with expensive predicates often produces plans that are orders of magnitude faster than plans generated by a traditional query optimizer. The additional complexity of considering expensive predicates during optimization is found to be manageably small.