Experiments with open-domain textual Question Answering
COLING '00 Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora
COLING '92 Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
Lucene in Action (In Action series)
Lucene in Action (In Action series)
Toward semantics-based answer pinpointing
HLT '01 Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology research
Design of the MUC-6 evaluation
MUC6 '95 Proceedings of the 6th conference on Message understanding
Overview of the answer validation exercise 2006
CLEF'06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Cross-Language Evaluation Forum: evaluation of multilingual and multi-modal information retrieval
Selecting Answers to Questions from Web Documents by a Robust Validation Process
WI-IAT '11 Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01
Leveraging community-built knowledge for type coercion in question answering
ISWC'11 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on The semantic web - Volume Part II
Methods combination and ML-based re-ranking of multiple hypothesis for question-answering systems
HYBRID '12 Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Hybrid Approaches to the Processing of Textual Data
A comparison of hard filters and soft evidence for answer typing in watson
ISWC'12 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on The Semantic Web - Volume Part II
Typing candidate answers using type coercion
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In open domain question-answering systems, numerous questions wait for answers of an explicit type. For example, the question "Which president succeeded Jacques Chirac?" requires an instance of president as answer. The method we present in this article aims at verifying that an answer given by a system corresponds to the given type. This verification is done by combining criteria provided by different methods dedicated to verify the appropriateness between an answer and a type. The first types of criteria are statistical and compute the presence rate of both the answer and the type in documents, other criteria rely on named entity recognizers and the last criteria are based on the use of Wikipedia.