Machine Learning
Fitness Distance Correlation as a Measure of Problem Difficulty for Genetic Algorithms
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
Generalized Curvatures
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Generality versus size in genetic programming
GECCO '96 Proceedings of the 1st annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
The estimation of hölderian regularity using genetic programming
Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Measuring bloat, overfitting and functional complexity in genetic programming
Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Optimization of the hölder image descriptor using a genetic algorithm
Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
A fine-grained view of GP locality with binary decision diagrams as ant phenotypes
PPSN'10 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Parallel problem solving from nature: Part I
Random sampling technique for overfitting control in genetic programming
EuroGP'12 Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Genetic Programming
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Recently, it has been stated that the complexity of a solution is a good indicator of the amount of overfitting it incurs. However, measuring the complexity of a program, in Genetic Programming, is not a trivial task. In this paper, we study the functional complexity and how it relates with overfitting on symbolic regression problems. We consider two measures of complexity, Slope-based Functional Complexity, inspired by the concept of curvature, and Regularity-based Functional Complexity based on the concept of Hölderian regularity. In general, both complexity measures appear to be poor indicators of program overfitting. However, results suggest that Regularity-based Functional Complexity could provide a good indication of overfitting in extreme cases.