Effect of using varying negative examples in transcription factor binding site predictions

  • Authors:
  • Faisal Rezwan;Yi Sun;Neil Davey;Rod Adams;Alistair G. Rust;Mark Robinson

  • Affiliations:
  • School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK;School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK;School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK;School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK;Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK;Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI

  • Venue:
  • EvoBIO'11 Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Evolutionary computation, machine learning and data mining in bioinformatics
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Identifying transcription factor binding sites computationally is a hard problem as it produces many false predictions. Combining the predictions from existing predictors can improve the overall predictions by using classification methods like Support Vector Machines (SVM). But conventional negative examples (that is, example of nonbinding sites) in this type of problem are highly unreliable. In this study, we have used different types of negative examples. One class of the negative examples has been taken from far away from the promoter regions, where the occurrence of binding sites is very low, and another one has been produced by randomization. Thus we observed the effect of using different negative examples in predicting transcription factor binding sites in mouse. We have also devised a novel cross-validation technique for this type of biological problem.