Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: An extended TAM model

  • Authors:
  • Christos D. Melas;Leonidas A. Zampetakis;Anastasia Dimopoulou;Vassilis Moustakis

  • Affiliations:
  • Technological Educational Institute of Crete, School of Technological Applications, Department of Sciences, Division of Computer Science, Heraklion, Crete, Greece;Technical University of Crete, Department of Production Engineering and Management, Management Systems Laboratory, Chania, Greece;Ippokratio, Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Athens, Greece;Technical University of Crete, Department of Production Engineering and Management, Management Systems Laboratory, Chania, Greece and Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Insti ...

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Recent empirical research has utilized the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to advance the understanding of doctors' and nurses' technology acceptance in the workplace. However, the majority of the reported studies are either qualitative in nature or use small convenience samples of medical staff. Additionally, in very few studies moderators are either used or assessed despite their importance in TAM based research. The present study focuses on the application of TAM in order to explain the intention to use clinical information systems, in a random sample of 604 medical staff (534 physicians) working in 14 hospitals in Greece. We introduce physicians' specialty as a moderator in TAM and test medical staff's information and communication technology (ICT) knowledge and ICT feature demands, as external variables. The results show that TAM predicts a substantial proportion of the intention to use clinical information systems. Findings make a contribution to the literature by replicating, explaining and advancing the TAM, whereas theory is benefited by the addition of external variables and medical specialty as a moderator. Recommendations for further research are discussed.