Operationalizing the essential role of the information technology artifact in information systems research: gray area, pitfalls, and the importance of strategic ambiguity

Authors:
Andrew B. Whinston;Xianjun Geng
Affiliations:
McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX;Management Science Department, University of Washington Business School, Seattle, WA
Venue:
MIS Quarterly
Year:
2004

Citing 6
Cited 8

Can the field of MIS be disciplined?

Communications of the ACM
Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research--A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact

Information Systems Research
Research Commentary: Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-Enabled Organizations

Information Systems Research
Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals

Journal of Management Information Systems
Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact

MIS Quarterly
The identity crisis within the is discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties

MIS Quarterly

Towards a research agenda for information technology

CITC5 '04 Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology education
Designing On-Line Mediation Services for C2C Markets

International Journal of Electronic Commerce
An Analysis of Diversity in Electronic Commerce Research

International Journal of Electronic Commerce
Taking industry seriously in information systems research

MIS Quarterly
Information Asymmetry in Information Systems Consulting: Toward a Theory of Relationship Constraints

Journal of Management Information Systems
Information Asymmetry in Information Systems Consulting: Toward a Theory of Relationship Constraints

Journal of Management Information Systems
Editor's comments: does MIS have native theories?

MIS Quarterly
The social life of categories: An empirical study of term categorization

Applied Ontology - Ontologies and Terminologies: Continuum or Dichotomy?

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we argue that a large gray area of information systems research exists, whose relevance to the information technology artifact is subject to significant debate even among IS scholars who support the essential role of the IT artifact. As we explain, not explicitly addressing this gray area can have negative, although often inadvertent, effects on the innovative nature of IS research; we explore this danger through three pitfalls. We then propose a stance of strategic ambiguity to deal with the gray area. Strategic ambiguity calls for deliberately withholding judgment on the relevance of research in the gray area and acceptance of gray-area research provided it meets the excellence required by professional journals. We believe that strategic ambiguity benefits innovative IS research without harming the essential role of the IT artifact.