The social life of categories: An empirical study of term categorization

Authors:
John W. Lamp;Simon K. Milton
Affiliations:
School of Information Systems, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. E-mail: john.lamp@deakin.edu.au;Department of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. E-mail: simon.milton@unimelb.edu.au
Venue:
Applied Ontology - Ontologies and Terminologies: Continuum or Dichotomy?
Year:
2012

Citing 8
Cited 0

IS '95: guidelines for undergraduate IS curriculum

MIS Quarterly - Special issue on IS curricula and pedagogy
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine

WWW7 Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web 7
Knowledge Assets: Securing Competetive Advantage in the Information Economy

Knowledge Assets: Securing Competetive Advantage in the Information Economy
Information Space

Information Space
Editorial Notes

Information Systems Research
Analyzing unstructured text data: Using latent categorization to identify intellectual communities in information systems

Decision Support Systems
Information systems as a reference discipline

MIS Quarterly
Operationalizing the essential role of the information technology artifact in information systems research: gray area, pitfalls, and the importance of strategic ambiguity

MIS Quarterly

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Most classification schemes in common use are actually categorization schemes which fall somewhere on a continuum between unstructured, uncontrolled lists of terms and formal classifications. Over time, terms change meaning and acquire new definitions. This paper presents the results of an approach that used the librarianship principle of consensus to form categories of terms and to relate those categories using a domain reference group. Boisot's Social Learning Cycle SLC was then used as a model with which to explain category variations. The single study undertaken in this investigation demonstrated the value of the SLC for explaining the variations between reference group members, and showed the potential for explaining category changes over time. This identifies areas in which consensus is breaking down or emerging, allowing for focused maintenance of categorical schemes.