Human-computer interaction
GI '05 Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2005
Modeling and understanding students' off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Early Prediction of Student Frustration
ACII '07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction
ITS '08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Contextual slip and prediction of student performance after use of an intelligent tutor
UMAP'10 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization
Adapting to when students game an intelligent tutoring system
ITS'06 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
The relationship between carelessness and affect in a cognitive tutor
ACII'11 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Affective computing and intelligent interaction - Volume Part I
A cross-cultural comparison of effective help-seeking behavior among students using an ITS for math
ITS'12 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A student is said to have committed a careless error when a student's answer is wrong despite the fact that he or she knows the answer (Clements, 1982). In this paper, educational data mining techniques are used to analyze log files produced by a cognitive tutor for Scatterplots to derive a model and detector for carelessness. Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and its variant, the Contextual-Slip-and-Guess Estimation, are used to model and predict carelessness behavior in the Scatterplot Tutor. The study examines as well the robustness of this detector to a major difference in the tutor's interface, namely the presence or absence of an embodied conversational agent, as well as robustness to data from a different school setting (USA versus Philippines).