Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors
Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
Finding influentials based on the temporal order of information adoption in twitter
Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
Flu detector: tracking epidemics on twitter
ECML PKDD'10 Proceedings of the 2010 European conference on Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases: Part III
Epidemic intelligence: for the crowd, by the crowd
ICWE'12 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Web Engineering
ESA: emergency situation awareness via microbloggers
Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
A roadmap to integrated digital public health surveillance: the vision and the challenges
Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Much attention has been focused on Twitter because it serves as a central hub for the publishing, dissemination, and discovery of online media. This is true for both traditional news outlets and user generated content, both of which can vary widely in their journalistic and scientific quality. The recent Swine Flu pandemic of 2009 highlighted this aspect perfectly, global events that created a large online buzz, with some dubious medical facts leaking into public opinion. This paper presents an investigation into how online resources relating to Swine Flu were discussed on Twitter, with a focus on identifying and analyzing the popularity of trusted information sources (e.g. from quality news outlets and official health agencies). Our findings indicate that reputable sources are more popular than untrusted ones, but that information with poor scientific merit can still leak into to the network and potentially cause harm.