Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics - Special issue on current and future challenges in the applications of mathematics
Computing Large Deformation Metric Mappings via Geodesic Flows of Diffeomorphisms
International Journal of Computer Vision
A data distributed parallel algorithm for nonrigid image registration
Parallel Computing
Geodesic Shooting for Computational Anatomy
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities
AFIPS '67 (Spring) Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, spring joint computer conference
Real-Time Non-rigid Registration of Medical Images on a Cooperative Parallel Architecture
BIBM '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Fast parallel unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction on multi-graphics processing units
EG PGV'09 Proceedings of the 9th Eurographics conference on Parallel Graphics and Visualization
Comparison of organs' shapes with geometric and Zernike 3D moments
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes an automated procedure for creating detailed patient-specific pediatric dosimetry phantoms from a small set of segmented organs in a child's CT scan. The algorithm involves full bodymappings fromadult template to pediatric images using multichannel large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping (MC-LDDMM). The parallel implementation and performance of MC-LDDMM for this application is studied here for a sample of 4 pediatric patients, and from 1 to 24 processors. 93.84% of computation time is parallelized, and the efficiency of parallelization remains high until more than 8 processors are used. The performance of the algorithm was validated on a set of 24 male and 18 female pediatric patients. It was found to be accurate typically to within 1-2 voxels (2-4mm) and robust across this large and variable data set.