Automated packet trace analysis of TCP implementations
SIGCOMM '97 Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '97 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication
Full TCP/IP for 8-bit architectures
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Mobile systems, applications and services
Language support for interoperable messaging in sensor networks
SCOPES '05 Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Software and compilers for embedded systems
An adaptive communication architecture for wireless sensor networks
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems
Tiny web services: design and implementation of interoperable and evolvable sensor networks
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems
Making sensor networks IPv6 ready
Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems
Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
Experiences with a high-fidelity wireless building energy auditing network
Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
sMAP: a simple measurement and actuation profile for physical information
Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
Interconnecting Smart Objects with IP: The Next Internet
Interconnecting Smart Objects with IP: The Next Internet
Lossy links, low power, high throughput
Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
Demo: Snap: rapid sensornet deployment with a sensornet appstore
Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
Demo: An interoperability development and performance diagnosis environment
Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
Strawman: resolving collisions in bursty low-power wireless networks
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks
Revisiting the need for mobile MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks
ACM SIGBED Review - Special Issue on the 3rd International Workshop on Networks of Cooperating Objects (CONET 2012)
On the applicability of network coding in wireless sensor networks
ACM SIGBED Review - Special Issue on the 3rd International Workshop on Networks of Cooperating Objects (CONET 2012)
Towards full RPL interoperability: addressing the case with downwards routing interoperability
Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems
EWSN'13 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Wireless Sensor Networks
A fuzzy control framework for wireless sensor networks
International Journal of Sensor Networks
A Framework for Testing of Wireless Underwater Robots
Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal
Splash: fast data dissemination with constructive interference in wireless sensor networks
nsdi'13 Proceedings of the 10th USENIX conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation
TCTM: an evaluation framework for architecture design on wireless sensor networks
International Journal of Sensor Networks
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Interoperability is essential for the commercial adoption of wireless sensor networks. However, existing sensor network architectures have been developed in isolation and thus interoperability has not been a concern. Recently, IP has been proposed as a solution to the interoperability problem of low-power and lossy networks (LLNs), considering its open and standards-based architecture at the network, transport, and application layers. We present two complete and interoperable implementations of the IPv6 protocol stack for LLNs, one for Contiki and one for TinyOS, and show that the cost of interoperability is low: their performance and overhead is on par with state-of-the-art protocol stacks custom built for the two platforms. At the same time, extensive testbed results show that the ensemble performance of a mixed network with nodes running the two interoperable stacks depends heavily on implementation decisions and parameters set at multiple protocol layers. In turn, these results argue that the current industry practice of interoperability testing does not cover the crucial topic of the performance and motivate the need for generic techniques that quantify the performance of such networks and configure their run-time behavior.