Graph minors. VII. Disjoint paths on a surface
Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B
4-connected projective-planar graphs are Hamiltonian
Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B
Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B
Worst-case comparison of valid inequalities for the TSP
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
Nonhamiltonian triangulations with large connectivity and representativity
Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B
Subgraphs of graphs on surfaces with high representativity
Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B
A linear-time approximation scheme for planar weighted TSP
FOCS '05 Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
On The Approximability Of The Traveling Salesman Problem
Combinatorica
Approximation algorithms via contraction decomposition
SODA '07 Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Contraction decomposition in h-minor-free graphs and algorithmic applications
Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
First-Order and Monadic Second-Order Model-Checking on Ordered Structures
LICS '12 Proceedings of the 2012 27th Annual IEEE/ACM Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
TSP tours in cubic graphs: beyond 4/3
ESA'12 Proceedings of the 20th Annual European conference on Algorithms
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We consider the following problem which is motivated by two different contexts independently, namely graph theory and combinatorial optimization. Given a 3-connected planar graph G with n vertices, is there a spanning closed walk W with at most 4n/3 edges? In graph theory, the above question is motivated by the famous hamiltonian result by Tutte in 1956 which says that every 4-connected planar graph is hamiltonian (a simpler proof is given by Thomassen in 1983). What happens if we relax the 4-connectivity? There is a 3-connected planar graph that is not hamiltonian, but how about a spanning close walk (which is exactly a traveling salesman tour. Sometimes such a walk is called hamiltonian walk)? How many edges are necessary to cover all the vertices of a 3-connected planar graph by a closed walk? This is exactly the above question. In combinatorial optimization, the famous traveling salesman problem in metric graphs is one of most fundamental NP-hard optimization problems. In spite of a vast amount of research several important questions remain open. In particular, the best known upper bound is not believed to be best possible. A promising direction to improve this approximation guarantee, has long been to understand the power of a linear program known as the Held-Karp relaxation [11]. On the one hand, the best lower bound on its integrality gap (for the symmetric case) is 4/3 and indeed the famous (so called 4/3-)conjecture said that this lower bound would be tight [10]. Goemans pointed out that there is a planar graph that achieves this bound. So he brought attention to the above question, i.e, the famous 4/3-conjecture is always true for 3-connected planar graphs. We prove the above problem in the following strong form; Given a circuit graph (which is obtained from a 3-connected planar graph by deleting one vertex) with n vertices, there is a spanning closed walk with at most 4(n − 1)/3 edges such that each edge is used at most twice. Moreover, our proof is constructive (and purely combinatorial) in a sense that there is an O(n2) algorithm to construct, given a 3-connected planar graph, such a walk. We shall construct an example that shows that the bound 4(n − 1)/3 is essentially tight. We also point out that 2-connected planar graphs may not have such a walk, as K2,n−2 shows.