Modelling partner’s behaviour in agent negotiation

Authors:
Jakub Brzostowski;Ryszard Kowalczyk
Affiliations:
Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia;Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
Venue:
AI'05 Proceedings of the 18th Australian Joint conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Year:
2005

Citing 4
Cited 2

Using and Evaluating Adaptive Agents for Electronic Commerce Negotiation

IBERAMIA-SBIA '00 Proceedings of the International Joint Conference, 7th Ibero-American Conference on AI: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Optimal Negotiation Strategies for Agents with Incomplete Information

ATAL '01 Revised Papers from the 8th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VIII
Determining Successful Negotiation Strategies: An Evolutionary Approach

ICMAS '98 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems
On possibilistic case-based reasoning for selecting partners in multi-agent negotiation

AI'04 Proceedings of the 17th Australian joint conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence

Predicting partner's behaviour in agent negotiation

AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Adaptive Negotiation with On-Line Prediction of Opponent Behaviour in Agent-Based Negotiations

IAT '06 Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on Intelligent Agent Technology

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

The paper proposes new approach for modelling negotiation partners and predictive decision-making. It is based on the prediction of negotiation partners behaviour from its previous offers in the current encounter. The approach allows the negotiating agent to asses different factors influencing other agent’s behaviour during negotiation and make optimal decisions according to the prediction. It is tested in simple scenario and the results illustrating the comparison with random strategy selection are presented.