Observability Analysis - Detecting When Improved Cryptosystems Fail
CT-RSA '02 Proceedings of the The Cryptographer's Track at the RSA Conference on Topics in Cryptology
Differential Fault Analysis of Secret Key Cryptosystems
CRYPTO '97 Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Cryptology Conference on Advances in Cryptology
Random Register Renaming to Foil DPA
CHES '01 Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
Optical Fault Induction Attacks
CHES '02 Revised Papers from the 4th International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
Design principles for tamper-resistant smartcard processors
WOST'99 Proceedings of the USENIX Workshop on Smartcard Technology on USENIX Workshop on Smartcard Technology
Tamper resistance: a cautionary note
WOEC'96 Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Proceedings of the Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce - Volume 2
On the importance of checking cryptographic protocols for faults
EUROCRYPT'97 Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on Theory and application of cryptographic techniques
Physical security bounds against tampering
ACNS'06 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security
Power and Fault Analysis Resistance in Hardware through Dynamic Reconfiguration
CHES '08 Proceeding sof the 10th international workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
CRT RSA algorithm protected against fault attacks
WISTP'07 Proceedings of the 1st IFIP TC6 /WG8.8 /WG11.2 international conference on Information security theory and practices: smart cards, mobile and ubiquitous computing systems
Is it wise to publish your public RSA keys?
FDTC'06 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
This contribution presents a unified adversarial model for fault analysis which considers various natures of faults and attack scenarios with a focus on pervasive low-cost cryptographic devices. According to their fault induction techniques we distinguish the non-invasive adversary, the semi-invasive adversary, and the invasive adversary. We introduce an implementation based concept of achievable spatial and time resolution that results from the physical fault induction technique. Generic defense strategies are reviewed.