Framework for an automated comparison of description logic reasoners

  • Authors:

  • Tom Gardiner;Dmitry Tsarkov;Ian Horrocks

  • Affiliations:

  • University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Venue:
  • ISWC'06 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on The Semantic Web
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

OWL is an ontology language developed by the W3C, and although initially developed for the Semantic Web, OWL has rapidly become a de facto standard for ontology development in general. The design of OWL was heavily influenced by research in description logics, and the specification includes a formal semantics. One of the goals of this formal approach was to provide interoperability: different OWL reasoners should provide the same results when processing the same ontologies. In this paper we present a system that allows users: (a) to test and compare OWL reasoners using an extensible library of real-life ontologies; (b) to check the “correctness” of the reasoners by comparing the computed class hierarchy; (c) to compare the performance of the reasoners when performing this task; and (d) to use SQL queries to analyse and present the results in any way they see fit.