A study of the evolution of the representational capabilities of process modeling grammars

  • Authors:

  • Michael Rosemann;Jan Recker;Marta Indulska;Peter Green

  • Affiliations:

  • Faculty of Information Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia;Faculty of Information Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia;UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Ipswich, Australia;UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Ipswich, Australia

  • Venue:
  • CAiSE'06 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A plethora of process modeling techniques has been proposed over the years. One way of evaluating and comparing the scope and completeness of techniques is by way of representational analysis. The purpose of this paper is to examine how process modeling techniques have developed over the last four decades. The basis of the comparison is the Bunge-Wand-Weber representation model, a benchmark used for the analysis of grammars that purport to model the real world and the interactions within it. This paper presents a comparison of representational analyses of several popular process modeling techniques and has two main outcomes. First, it provides insights, within the boundaries of a representational analysis, into the extent to which process modeling techniques have developed over time. Second, the findings also indicate areas in which the underlying theory seems to be over-engineered or lacking in specialization.