Evaluation of the CyberGlove as a whole-hand input device
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Multi-finger haptic rendering of deformable objects
EGVE'04 Proceedings of the Tenth Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments
A distributed approach for assistive service provision in pervasive environment
WMASH '06 Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots
A semantic approach for accessible services delivery in a smart environment
International Journal of Web and Grid Services
Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Accurate and Accessible Motion-Capture Glove Calibration for Sign Language Data Collection
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
People with severe motor disabilities use mainly their residual motor capability for the use of technical aids, and for the control of input devices to technical aids. This paper describes our work on characterizing the motor capability of the upper arm for patients with severe motor disabilities. This work is a continuation of a project aimed at modeling the arm posture of quadriplegic patients using STS (Spatial Tracking System) and at analyzing the compensatory strategies developed by hemiplegic patients while accessing physical interfaces for technical aids [5]. Here we report work undertaken for analyzing the posture of the hand: we have developed two calibration methods for the Cyberglove and compare their utility and ergonomics in applications on patients with motor disabilities. The first type of calibration proceeds sequentially and takes into account one joint after the other (of the hand and each digit), whereas the second procedure is based on a few key postures calibrating several joints at once. To compare the precision of both methods, four healthy subjects participated in experiments using the Cyberglove. We show that the first type of calibration is more accurate but takes longer, whereas the second is less accurate but shorter. This trade-off might be acceptable for assessing the manual workspace in patients with motor disabilities. In particular, excessive muscular fatigue and limited dexterity are decisive factors for choosing the calibration by key postures in patients. We applied the calibration by key postures to three myopathic patients and individually quantified their restricted manual working space.