R&D Versus Acquisitions: Role of Diversification in the Choice of Innovation Strategy by Information Technology Firms

Authors:
Rajiv Banker;Sunil Wattal;Jose Plehn-Dujowich
Affiliations:
Center for Accounting and Information Technology at the Fox School of Business, Temple University;Fox School of Business, Temple University;Fox School of Business, Temple University
Venue:
Journal of Management Information Systems
Year:
2011

Citing 4
Cited 1

The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail

The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail
Research Report: Disruptive Technologies--Explaining Entry in Next Generation Information Technology Markets

Information Systems Research
Human Capital and Institutional Determinants of Information Technology Compensation: Modeling Multilevel and Cross-Level Interactions

Management Science
In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition

Management Science

The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan's semiconductor industry

Scientometrics

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This research examines the role of diversification on incumbent firms' response to the threat of new entry. When faced with threats posed by new technologies, incumbent firms in the information technology (IT) industry can either perform research and development (R&D), or acquire the new entrants who are successful at innovating. We use a two-stage game-theoretic framework to model the relation between diversification and the decision to acquire versus perform R&D. We also collect data on financial indicators for firms in the IT industry using the Compustat database to empirically test the propositions from the analytical model. Our results suggest that firms with a higher degree of diversification are more likely to innovate through acquisition than through R&D. Moreover, diversification has a positive effect on investment in acquisitions, as well as a negative effect on investment in R&D.