Critiquing media reports with flawed scientific findings: operation ARIES! a game with animated agents and natural language trialogues

  • Authors:
  • Art Graesser;Anne Britt;Keith Millis;Patty Wallace;Diane Halpern;Zhiqiang Cai;Kris Kopp;Carol Forsyth

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, Memphis, TN;Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL;Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL;Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL;Department of Psychology, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA;Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, Memphis, TN;Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL;Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, Memphis, TN

  • Venue:
  • ITS'10 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems - Volume Part II
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Operation Aries! is a computer environment that helps students learn about scientific methods and inquiry The system has several components designed to optimize learning and motivation, such as game features, animated agents, natural language communication, trialogues among agents, an eBook, multimedia, and formative assessment The present focus is on a Case Study learning module that involves critiquing reports of scientific findings in news media that have flawed scientific methodology After the human student lists the methodological flaws of a Case Study in natural language, a teacher agent and a peer agent hold a trialogue with the student that evaluates each listed flaw and that uncovers additional flaws that that student missed.