An empirical study on the granularity of pointer analysis in c programs

  • Authors:

  • Tong Chen;Jin Lin;Wei-Chung Hsu;Pen-Chung Yew

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota;Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota;Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota;Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota

  • Venue:
  • LCPC'02 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing
  • Year:
  • 2002

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Pointer analysis plays a critical role in modern C compilers because of the frequent appearances of pointer expressions. It is even more important for data dependence analysis, which is essential in exploiting parallelism, because complex data structures such as arrays are often accessed through pointers in C. One of the important aspects of pointer analysis methods is their granularity, the way in which the memory objects are named for analysis. The naming schemes used in a pointer analysis affect its effectiveness, especially for pointers pointing to heap memory blocks. In this paper, we present a new approach that applies the compiler analysis and profiling techniques together to study the impact of the granularity in pointer analyses. An instrumentation tool, based on the Intel's Open Resource Compiler (ORC), is devised to simulate different naming schemes and collect precise target sets for indirect references at runtime. The collected target sets are then fed back to the ORC compiler to evaluate the effectiveness of different granularity in pointer analyses. The change of the alias queries in the compiler analyses and the change of performance of the output code at different granularity levels are observed. With the experiments on the SPEC CPU2000 integer benchmarks, we found that 1) finer granularity of pointer analysis show great potential in optimizations, and may bring about up to 15% performance improvement, 2) the common naming scheme, which gives heap memory blocks names according to the line number of system memory allocation calls, is not powerful enough for some benchmarks. The wrapper functions for allocation or the user-defined memory management functions have to be recognized to produce better pointer analysis result, 3) pointer analysis of fine granularity requires inter-procedural analysis, and 4) it is also quite important that a naming scheme distinguish the fields of a structure in the targets.