Pattern Recognition
A survey of thresholding techniques
Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing
On minimum error thresholding and its implementations
Pattern Recognition Letters
A note on minimum error thresholding
Pattern Recognition Letters
Image thresholding: some new techniques
Signal Processing
Objective and quantitative segmentation evaluation and comparison
Signal Processing
Comment on Using the Uniformity Measure for Performance Measure in Image Segmentation
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Minimum error thresholding: a note
Pattern Recognition Letters
Evaluation of global image thresholding for change detection
Pattern Recognition Letters
Characterization of empirical discrepancy evaluation measures
Pattern Recognition Letters
Unimodal thresholding for edge detection
Pattern Recognition
Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
An efficient iterative algorithm for image thresholding
Pattern Recognition Letters
Pattern Recognition Letters
Characteristic analysis of Otsu threshold and its applications
Pattern Recognition Letters
Median-based image thresholding
Image and Vision Computing
Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Maximum similarity thresholding
Digital Signal Processing
Hi-index | 0.10 |
There are close relationships between three popular approaches to image thresholding, namely Ridler and Calvard's iterative-selection (IS) method, Kittler and Illingworth's minimum-error-thresholding (MET) method and Otsu's method. The relationships can be briefly described as: the IS method is an iterative version of Otsu's method; Otsu's method can be regarded as a special case of the MET method. The purpose of this correspondence is to provide a comprehensive clarification, some practical implications and further discussions of these relationships.